Inspired by Jason Kottke’s awesome digging in the newly-opened NY Times archive, here are some items from the archive documenting music and recording history.
The first reference to Edison’s phonograph seems to be this satirical piece from November, 1877. At least, I hope it’s satirical:
There is good reason to believe that if the phonograph proves to be what its inventor claims that it is, both book making and reading will fall into disuse.
…
The politician, instead of howling himself hoarse on the platform, will have a pint of his best speech put in the hands of each one of his constituents.
I’m not sure I’d want a pint of anything offered by a politician.
The Times’ first description of Edison’s phonograph appears in March of the following year, recounting the demonstration to “an intelligent audience” of a six-tabled array of mysterious instruments.
A June, 1878 article discusses David Hughes invention of the carbon microphone, an “astonishing instrument or apparatus, which opens to our ears a universe of sounds hitherto inaudible.”
Berliner’s gramophone was first mentioned October 24th, 1890.
Jul 19, 1897 saw the earliest reference to Marconi’s “contrivance for wireless telegraphy.”
an electrical machine on a stick with an electric wire wrapped around it. Electric vibrations are transmitted to another stick attached to a receiver. An electric hammer records the dots and dashes.
There’s no reference to Fessenden’s invention of AM radio, nor his first “broadcast” on Christmas Eve, 1906. (Though we wouldn’t really expect one. Fessenden wasn’t recognized as the inventor of modern radio until much later.) However, the prevailing favour of Marconi’s approach is evidenced in this OpEd piece from December, 1907, championing Marconi’s accomplishments from across the pond: “Of ten dispatches from our correspondent in America, nine have been delivered correctly.” Apparently, the “can you hear me now” guy has historical precedent.
Finally, the earliest reference to a music industry I could find appeared February, 1921. Musical instrument manufacturers argued in favour of a uniform sales tax, and against excise and surplus income taxes. Draw your own conclusion from that one.
Tags: history, music-business, radio
5 comments
Trackback URI Comments feed for this article
This is great! But also, I was kinda hoping to read some of the first references to The Beatles, the Stones… or Kurt Cobain’s death… stuff like that. It would be very interesting.
Des – back in the day (!) the “music industry” was publishing. There are lots of early references, including the obit for GIULIO T. RICORDI on June7, 1912, head of one of the biggest music publishing houses. Obits have a lot of interesting information in them, so I visit them regularly (may tie in to my fascination with graveyards). Ricordi’s family business published all of Verdi, Rossini, Donizetti, Bellini, Puccini and others. Though not Fusilli , as he was spiraling out of control at that point ;)
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=990DE5D7153CE633A25754C0A9609C946396D6CF
On May 3, 1853 we see an article about the new edition of some Scottish songs. “Songs of Scotland,” vol. 1; “Irish Melodies,” vol. 1. J. A. NOVELLO, No. 389 Broadway, has sent us the especial American edition of the above compositions. They are included in two neat volumes, published at a low price, but possessing all the clearness and elegance which the best type, printing, paper and binding can impart.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9A01EEDD1331E13BBC4B53DFB3668388649FDE
So, the music business is indeed alive and well in the NY Times archive :) Grab a shovel!
Sweet! Thanks Roymond.
Howdy there,I discover that your weblog is extremely educational and helpful and we wonder if there can be a possibility of obtaining More web content like this on your web log. If you willing to help us out, we will be willing to compensate you¡ Best wishes, William Kuokkanen
I know right. Needs some updates though