Pitch correction software has applications from restoration and mix-rescue to outright distortion of a voice or instrument. I’ll discuss some of the more tasteful uses of these auto-tune tools (whether the original from Antares, or a variant like the free GSnap) below. But first I thought I’d highlight their misuse to illustrate the effects we usually try to avoid.
So, listen here to 10 of pop music’s most blatant auto-tune abuses:
If you’re unfamiliar with Auto-tune, and especially if you listen to much pop and rock, you might not hear it initially. When overdone, the effect yields an unnatural yodel or warble in a singer’s voice. But the sound is so commonplace in modern mainstream music that your ears may have tuned out the auto-tune!
The songs in this clip, in order, and the phrases most affected by auto-tuning to help you spot them:
Dixie Chicks – The Long Way Around – Noticeable on “parents” and “but I.”
T-Pain – I’m Sprung – Especially obvious on “homies” and “lady.”
Avril Lavigne – Complicated – Listen to “way,” “when,” “driving,” “you’re.”
Uncle Kracker – Follow Me
The whole vocal sounds strained, but especially the word “goodbye.”
Maroon 5 – She Will Be Loved – Listen for “rain” and “smile.”
Natasha Bedingfield – Love Like This – “Apart” and “life.”
Sean Kingston – Beautiful girls – “OoooOver” doesn’t sound human.
JoJo – Too Little Too Late – Appropriately, “problem” stands out.
Rascal Flatts – Life is a Highway
Every vocal, foreground and background, is treated, but “drive” in particular.
New Found Glory – Hit or Miss – “Thriller”, and every time Jordan sings “I.”
The Cher Effect
When used noticeably, an auto-tuner produces what most call “The Cher Effect“, named for her trademark sound in the song Believe*. (In essence, we named the effect like scientists naming a new disease after its first victim.) Treated this heavily, a vocal track sounds synthetic, and obviously processed.
But not all auto-tuning is so blatant. In the sample above, it’s harder to hear the pitch correction on Uncle Kracker and Avril than on T-Pain and Bedingfield.
Tasteful Uses
As with any tool, a little care can yield great results. Some simple things to keep in mind about pitch correction tools:
- Performance: Most importantly, an auto-tuner isn’t a shortcut to a perfect performance. If you can’t sing the song properly, no amount of post-processing will make it sound like you did. So when your pitch matters, and you don’t want to correct it with an effect, you’ll need to work on your performance until it’s right.
- Less is more: The fewer notes you correct, the less obvious your use of an auto tuner will be. Consider automating the plugin so it acts only when most needed.
- Graphical mode: If your pitch correction software offers a graphical mode (like Antares Auto-Tune and Melodyne,) learn how to work with it. The default “auto” modes are OK for basic corrections, but often produce noticeable yodeling.
- Backing vocals: In general, you can get away with more pitch correction on backing vocals than lead vocals.
- Outdated: Obvious vocoder-style autotuning is dated, and borders on kitschy. The synthetic warbling vocal sound marks songs as having come from a specific era, the same way gated-reverb on drums instantly places a song in the 1980’s. Remember: If you make the auto tuner obvious, people will say your song uses “the Cher effect.” Let this be a guideline.
Be sure it’s needed
Two songs have auto tuners on my mind today: Snoop’s Sensual Seduction (because of Anil Dash’s ruminations on the death of the analog vocoder,) and Natasha Bedingfield’s Love Like This, which I heard on the radio. In the former, the auto tuner is clearly a gimmick. But every time I hear Bedingfield’s song, I’m struck by the same question: Why do that to her voice?
She’s a fantastic singer, and once you’ve heard the song without the cheesy auto tuner effect, it’s hard to take the radio single seriously.
And there’s a lesson in that for home recordists, (even those of us who don’t write pop music,) which echoes the rule of mixing: If an effect significantly changes the sound of a track, especially one so important as the lead vocal, be sure that change improves the song before committing it to the mix.
See Also: The Rule of Mixing
For more home recording tips,
Subscribe to the Hometracked feed, or receive email updates.
Tags: freeplugins, mixing
238 comments
Trackback URI Comments feed for this article
Oh.So thats why hip hop is still
Sweet….so basically i can use one of those,spend some time putting together a bunch of random synthesized loops and create my own hip hop beats.
Maybe i can make a living off being mostly untalented.
hmmm…..
look at artists like Kesha… she did it, you can too!
Its a crying shame how bad the auto abuse is… Its rare these days to find singer that can actually sing in tune and I think its partly due to the fact that these up and coming artist know that music is so highly manipulated and processed that they don’t have to work as hard anymore. Even at my own recording studio I have rappers and singers alike asking me all the time, “do u have auto-tune so u can make me sound better.”
Autotune has become ubiquitous in modern so called “music”, with many “singers” never doing without (rhymes with Eighty Dairy, amongst others offenders) . Even TV shows like Glee use it constantly. It sounds like nails on a chalk board to me – I turn that stuff off immediately. It should be banned.
I wrote a song about the badness of it all. No Auto tune used
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h15YpF2o6-A&feature=related
I get what you’re saying about auto-tune abuse, although sometimes sounding robot-like can sound cool in electronic music. Also, I don’t think Gary LeVox of Rascal Flatts really uses pitch correction that much – he’s actually a really good singer.
New Found Glory does not use auto tune!!!!!!!!
if you can’t do a record without auto tuning it than this is not your calling in life its cool if only adding some effects but not the whole deal
My kids listen to Radio Disney all the time in the car. I don’t hear a song that DOESN’T use Auto-Tune. Demi Lovato, Jasmine Sagginario, etc. can’t live without it. Hard to figure it’s just an effect at that point.
It is incredible how much auto-tune is used now in the production of sound, but what is more amazing still is the natural talent of voices from the 50s and 60s (ie Sinatra and Holiday). I think we truly miss out on the depth of emotion in music when some sound is over-produced.
Those morons are ruining the music. Fucking anyone can become a singer with that auto tune shit.. Fucking assholes.
I’m sorry…some of those are DEFINITELY auto-tuned, but have you even HEARD Rascal Flatts live? That was NOT auto tune!
PS- learn the difference between your and you’re. Grammar can save lives…
Let’s eat Grandpa!
Let’s eat, Grandpa!
Actually, Rascal Flatts is DEFINITELY using auto-tune. The high tenor harmony parts are especially egregious in the use of auto-tune.
Just because it’s not overdone (a la T-Pain), doesn’t mean it’s not done. What’s more, if you think people aren’t using auto-tune because you’ve “heard” them “sing” live, wake up. Auto-tune is used live all the time. It’s no longer relegated to only in-studio trickery. Even bluegrass artists (choke, cough… Ricky Skaggs, Alison Krauss) use it live and in studio nowadays.
e a singer with that auto tune shit.. Fucking assholes.
Okay, tired of a meme now:
The difference between pitch-fix abuse & guitar wankery is simple & rather bloody obvious. If an axe-wielder uses in-yer-face flange or wah or whatever on Every Damned Track, then many people will notice, & the few who remain won’t natter endlessly about what a “natural” sound this “talented” musician achieves. (And even people who’re substantially tone-deaf can spot that something’s not quite right if a note is flat.)
Before anyone thinks they’ve caught me out: I’ve got a very good ear, so I can be aware of guitarists who have some sort of chorus or whatever running all the time to “thicken” the sound & make it move. But in a well-done song, it doesn’t obtrude, the effect doesn’t call attention to itself — that’s hugely different from a guy who has his Stereo Chorus with all the knobs past noon.
Antares or Melodyne used in a live situation to push a few terribly off-pitch notes back in line? Great; approval here. But all the time? Ugh. Has anyone taken a track from (say) Frank Sinatra or Billie Holiday or Nat Cole & made it “perfect” yet?
Auto-Tune was/is a godsend in the studio, for when you’d got a near-spotless take, but there was one or two notes that just set teeth on edge. Braver souls than me would even manipulate tape reels in hopes of pushing the gaffe to an acceptable pitch via a redub.
I find “the Cher effect” hilarious; always sounded like something Vince Clarke should’ve created. But “Believe” sorta has claim to it, & anything since is a knockoff. And if I had to do an important show suffering from a headcold (hardly a reason to cancel a gig), I’d WANT a corrector!!
I don’t see where the OP decries the device — just its blatant abuse. To me, it feels like we’re drifting back to Milli Vanilli; why not just have prime singers backstage & let the camera-ready frontmen lip-sync? (Like that hilarious Blues Traveler vid, “Run-Around,” where the ugly old men were carefully hidden from the crowd.) It’d still be a “live” performance.
All singers who distort their vocals with this crap sound alike and sound stupid. Music died long ago, so now they are reinventing themselves and jumping on the auto tune bandwagon and making a quick buck off the mindless idiots who actually like it.
Esperanza Spalding, who recently won new artist award, does not use autotune. Most jazz artists don’t, but I think Nikki Yanofsky does (a little). Also, most singers who play a wind instrument well can sing in tune. This may be because of how hard wind players work to get their instruments in tune.
Also, what’s up with these blogs? These people aren’t journalists!!!! Go buy a newspaper. Those people work hard to go out and get the facts instead of sitting at home and watching CNN and writing a comment on it…
…The point of technology is to make life easier…
…if you think auto-tune makes singing too easy. Why dont you start washing your clothes by hand too? I’m sure Architects are still hand sketching all their designs. Or artists only use brushes and oil based paint…Sounds like a lot of jealousy.
ok guy if you really want all music to turn to shit. and about the spiel on the architecture and artists im fairly sure that they need to be good at painting by hand and drawing out plans by hand without the aid of a computer before getting jobs in architecture and difrent type of artistry. its called learning the basics and you learn those back in college.
so basicaly auto tune is for people that cant sing using it as a short cut to fame.
ALL of these groups suck balls. I would let the chick in the Dixie Chick suck my balls but they all suck.
Jesus, some of you are going bat-shit crazy over this. Turn it off if you don’t like it! It’s not ruining music! Your cooler-than-thou music that hasn’t sold out to the “man” would never even THINK about using it, so stick with your thang. You’re attempting to play all of your cool cards by talking shit about the artists mentioned, but you just come off as looking like some kind of sawed-off asshole with a chip on your shoulder. And by the way, auto-tune will not correct a complete and total lack of talent. There has to be something there to begin with.
While I agree with the premise of this article, as others have said, a good deal of the examples are purposely using it as an effect (albeit stupid and already-dated). On some of the other examples I think you’ve misidentified autotune problems. For example, while I’m sure that New Found Glory uses plenty of pitch correction, the “I” sounds to me as if he’s SUNG that change in notes.
Check out my blog on autotune. http://jamikekenandfriends.blogspot.com/2011/04/autotune-isnt-magic-tool-everyone.html
To be honest, when not used over the top, and when used as an effect, instead of a correction tool, it can sometimes produce a decent song. However, if a talentless pop-star is using it to make money off of effects and lack of talent, then it becomes a problem.
More Comments: ‹ Previous · 1 · … · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · Next ›