Pitch correction software has applications from restoration and mix-rescue to outright distortion of a voice or instrument. I’ll discuss some of the more tasteful uses of these auto-tune tools (whether the original from Antares, or a variant like the free GSnap) below. But first I thought I’d highlight their misuse to illustrate the effects we usually try to avoid.
So, listen here to 10 of pop music’s most blatant auto-tune abuses:
If you’re unfamiliar with Auto-tune, and especially if you listen to much pop and rock, you might not hear it initially. When overdone, the effect yields an unnatural yodel or warble in a singer’s voice. But the sound is so commonplace in modern mainstream music that your ears may have tuned out the auto-tune!
The songs in this clip, in order, and the phrases most affected by auto-tuning to help you spot them:
Dixie Chicks – The Long Way Around – Noticeable on “parents” and “but I.”
T-Pain – I’m Sprung – Especially obvious on “homies” and “lady.”
Avril Lavigne – Complicated – Listen to “way,” “when,” “driving,” “you’re.”
Uncle Kracker – Follow Me
The whole vocal sounds strained, but especially the word “goodbye.”
Maroon 5 – She Will Be Loved – Listen for “rain” and “smile.”
Natasha Bedingfield – Love Like This – “Apart” and “life.”
Sean Kingston – Beautiful girls – “OoooOver” doesn’t sound human.
JoJo – Too Little Too Late – Appropriately, “problem” stands out.
Rascal Flatts – Life is a Highway
Every vocal, foreground and background, is treated, but “drive” in particular.
New Found Glory – Hit or Miss – “Thriller”, and every time Jordan sings “I.”
The Cher Effect
When used noticeably, an auto-tuner produces what most call “The Cher Effect“, named for her trademark sound in the song Believe*. (In essence, we named the effect like scientists naming a new disease after its first victim.) Treated this heavily, a vocal track sounds synthetic, and obviously processed.
But not all auto-tuning is so blatant. In the sample above, it’s harder to hear the pitch correction on Uncle Kracker and Avril than on T-Pain and Bedingfield.
Tasteful Uses
As with any tool, a little care can yield great results. Some simple things to keep in mind about pitch correction tools:
- Performance: Most importantly, an auto-tuner isn’t a shortcut to a perfect performance. If you can’t sing the song properly, no amount of post-processing will make it sound like you did. So when your pitch matters, and you don’t want to correct it with an effect, you’ll need to work on your performance until it’s right.
- Less is more: The fewer notes you correct, the less obvious your use of an auto tuner will be. Consider automating the plugin so it acts only when most needed.
- Graphical mode: If your pitch correction software offers a graphical mode (like Antares Auto-Tune and Melodyne,) learn how to work with it. The default “auto” modes are OK for basic corrections, but often produce noticeable yodeling.
- Backing vocals: In general, you can get away with more pitch correction on backing vocals than lead vocals.
- Outdated: Obvious vocoder-style autotuning is dated, and borders on kitschy. The synthetic warbling vocal sound marks songs as having come from a specific era, the same way gated-reverb on drums instantly places a song in the 1980’s. Remember: If you make the auto tuner obvious, people will say your song uses “the Cher effect.” Let this be a guideline.
Be sure it’s needed
Two songs have auto tuners on my mind today: Snoop’s Sensual Seduction (because of Anil Dash’s ruminations on the death of the analog vocoder,) and Natasha Bedingfield’s Love Like This, which I heard on the radio. In the former, the auto tuner is clearly a gimmick. But every time I hear Bedingfield’s song, I’m struck by the same question: Why do that to her voice?
She’s a fantastic singer, and once you’ve heard the song without the cheesy auto tuner effect, it’s hard to take the radio single seriously.
And there’s a lesson in that for home recordists, (even those of us who don’t write pop music,) which echoes the rule of mixing: If an effect significantly changes the sound of a track, especially one so important as the lead vocal, be sure that change improves the song before committing it to the mix.
See Also: The Rule of Mixing
For more home recording tips,
Subscribe to the Hometracked feed, or receive email updates.
Tags: freeplugins, mixing
238 comments
Trackback URI Comments feed for this article
You know, though, from a pure effect angle, I love the sound of auto-tune. For me, it makes shitty songs a bit more listenable. I’ve always thought of the human voice as an instrument, so the sound of auto-tune is simply an effect. It’s so unlike anything you typically hear with the human voice (other than throat singers from various parts of the world). But of course, that doesn’t make it a good thing to do.
Josh B: “I sing the song three or four times, record all four takes and then listen to the first recording and replace problematic sections with relevant portions of the other 3 recordings.”
That’s called “comping”, and it was not an uncommon technique throughout the seventies. You can ask Terry Manning all about it. :)
Another example is Miley Cyrus aka Hanna Montana…I was listening to my daughters cd of her and it is so noticable I had to laugh.. I then heard a version of her and her fathers (Billy Ray Cyrus) song “ready set don’t go” and as soon as Miley started singing you could hear the artifacts so bad…
i dont think Maroon 5 uses it on that one song, its too smooth.
I use autotune often like an advanced vocoder (like in snoop’s sensual seduction), or to make backings from an lead singing part, …
It’s also a nice effect sometimes to put a synth trough autotune.
But if it’s used as correction on a natural voice, i hate it. Just like i hate beat detective and similar tools. Learn first how to play, and start recording after it.
I use autotune often like an advanced vocoder (like in snoop’s sensual seduction), or to make backings from an lead singing part, …
It’s also a nice effect sometimes to put a synth trough autotune.
But if it’s used as correction on a natural voice, i hate it. Just like i hate beat detective and similar tools. Learn first how to play, and start recording after it in stead of correcting everyting. You won’t be able to do that on stage neighter
God knows that Avril has studio help (she can’t really sing that good, although she’s not THAT bad), but autotune on “Complicated”? I looked for your examples of the autotuned words on the MP3 file and couldn’t hear it…
Chris Brown’s Forever pours the effect on real thick. I put the auto-tune in the same category as the talk box used by Peter Frampton back in the Mesozoic Era – or the wa-wa pedal on guitar. It’s an effect. The unfortunate thing is that the public is actually duped into thinking their pop stars can actually sing on key.
Jenn…about the Rascal Flatts live thing…
It is fairly obvious that there is use of an auto-tuner on the recorded version. And it IS possible to use an auto-tuner live without it being played from a recording. Antares has one called ATR-1 and there’s another one that I saw the other day…I can’t think of who makes it and can’t find the link for it, though. So although they may be playing and singing live, chances are that those weren’t totally legit vocals.
Okay, I don’t understand. Auto tune is used in many other genres besides pop, rock, and hip hop. It’s a handy tool to kick up a decent performance to a great one. This being the case, it can be utilized to allow someone, say, Art C. Indie and his band, to put together something not about vocals but about composition, something that adheres to the fundamentals of artistic expression. Your arguments are petty and irrelevant to the concept of creating art. Furthermore, the use of ‘dated’ techniques isn’t limited to pitch correction–after all, aren’t 8-bit punk artists just doing what the people who invented the Game Boy and similar devices intended to do in the first place? Your superficial and elitist opinion should be supplemented with a dose of reality. Not everyone can sing. Even professional singers (that don’t use Auto Tune) aren’t always an astounding vocalist. It’s about presentation, arrangement, and the feeling behind a particular song.
I heard the Maroon 5 guy play with an acoustic guitar live on the radio here in San Diego a couple years ago…IT WAS HORRIBLE…the guy couldn’t carry a tune in a bucket!
Everyone one in the office was cringing at how horrible he sang.
He’d have no career without Auto Tune.
How can you sing a song that YOU WROTE out of key?
Did the Beatles need Auto Tune?
Thanks for all these comments and this suprisenly useful artical. It’s actually helped me decide which out of the programs Melodyne or Auto-Tune I’m buying;
I’ve read a few comments defacing a lot of the artists on the mp3 as being with out “talent” Which simply is wrong.
I’m a musican, I play all kinds of instruments, one might say I’m talented.
I can’t sing well, I have my good and bad days. But it ruins a stage performance when the singer is playing a great guitar performace but lacks the vocal – it’s an audience hears, ’cause that’s what they look for – faults.
So yeah, I’ll use Auto-Tune – but I’m not without talent.
As for these artists – it takes talent to sell records. The musical industray doesn’t just pick random people, tell them to sing and sort out the faults later – it’s not all about vocal.
it’s ALL audience hears, ’cause that’s what they look for – faults.**
Rai-Quote-1
Even professional singers (that don’t use Auto Tune) aren’t always an astounding vocalist.
Me=If you can’t sing then you shouldn’t be a musician. I can’t do sculptures so I don’t.
Rai-Quote-2
It’s about presentation, arrangement, and the feeling behind a particular song.
Me= Yes and that is exactly what this effect removes from a song..
“And also the sound quality is terrible with the 128k bitrate MP3″…OR,Maybe YOU might be MISTAKING the Auto-Tune sounds for artifacts,rather than the quality being a problem ;-)…
Jenn – ” I’ve seen Rascal Flatts in concert several times and that’s how the vocals sound without the use of correction software.” – Are you aware there is also a rackmount piece of hardware that can be used live at any and all times as well?!…Maybe each time you’ve seen them live,they’ve used it…Hmmm…
I dont think so JACKASS !
Avril is the best stop of say shiT!
To “YourEpic” who says “So yeah, I’ll use Auto-Tune – but I’m not without talent.”
I respond – You may not be without talent in other areas, but if what you say is true, you do not have a talent for singing. You should stay away from the mic. Simple as that. Talent in one area does not equal talent in all areas… strange logic you have there and I think you are a bit lost with your illusion of record label tactics. By your standards, everyone that a record company picks to push therefore must be talented. Hmm, very interesting…. I think you have bought into the game and probably don’t understand the art and soul of music. You are likely still just a pup.
Autotune degrades authenticity. It lowers the value of a real musicians’ effort. To me music is a fine art, but to many in this world, music is just a product to be reconciled in regards to cost and resources. For those of you who believe in the dollar as a defining factor of success, I feel sorry for you. For you are helping to destroy a beautiful concept… you are equating music with a mass produced McDonalds hamburger. You are not an artist.
Yes, some people do define quality by the amount of money generated, but everyone should know by now that it is only a sad commentary on today’s lazy and greedy society.
Music is so much more than simple parameters that can be tweaked and fads that can be copied, yet some of you will never understand this and will continue to validate yourselves by such primitive standards.
Music has a soul and when processing overshadows the source, you are raping the soul of music. It is easy to tell simply by listening for the honesty and integrity. If you are an engineer or producer that follows in most so called music professionals’ footsteps, you will cave in for lack of artistic integrity… likely you will be “successful†by today’s pitiful standards.
all of those artists should be thrown in the lake at least one hundred times consecutively. They’ve all left reality! pop’s like doritos to food, spiritual famine.
You would at least think that, if they truly need to make everything sound perfect with “autotune”, they would at least go back and fix the EXTREMELY OBVIOUS un-natural sounds. I mean no disrespect to them when I say that.
HOMETRACKED, you’re a moron. Who’s to say voice correction is dated? Since when did you become the guru of all music trends.
Most of the “examples” you quote are using it as an artistic tool and are MEANT to sound that way. I just can’t believe your conceited attitude to this subject. It’s like saying Ska is dead, or long hair is dated, or guitars are out.
Call it old school, but pitch correction really bothers me. I am very sensative to the obnoxious overtones it produces. It is so widely accepted, I feel like I’m the only one who hates the thing. It is everywhere and it just sounds nasty. Besides there are a number of other issues about it that bother me.
I can’t really take a singer seriously after I hear electronic enhancements to their voice. Yet there are truly great singers who use the darn thing. I cannot understand why singers who have great voices ruin their music with pitch correction. Are they that insecure? Nothing says ‘can’t sing’ or ‘poser’ like automatic pitch correction. So why would they want to wreck their reputation by corrcting their pitch when they don’t need to?
Another issue has to do with the fact that they are cheating. If singers are going to clean up their pitch issues rather than learning to sing, why not just have a computer make the music and get rid of the human? It would be more honest and would probably be cheaper. If they do have pitch issues, then they should not be given credit for having talent that they don’t have, hence the comment that nothing says ‘can’t sing’ like pitch correction. I would also contend that no pitch corrected music will ever be classic, lasting music. It will be soon forgotten as throw away.
It also sounds worse to have electronically sanitized music. It is inherently less interesting and takes away from the musicality of a song. I would much rather hear a human voice, even with its imperfections than hear electronic noise. I strongly consider pitch correction just another form of distortion. Can musicians please stop using it?
One word: Kanye
Since no one tracks why people don’t buy products, a major flaw in our system of advertising, I don’t think anyone will ever know how many sales have been lost due to obnoxious voice correction. I will never buy music that I know has auto voice correction on it.
Musicians who are known for good voices like Michael Buble, Celine Dion and Lara Fabian should step off of the voice correction bandwagon if indeed thier voices and talents are really as good as billed. Based on the type of music they produce, they seem mre interested in lasting quality music than, here today gone tomorrow, pop music. Using voice correction for them is ill advised and they risk going down in history as fakers. Their beautiful voices are being polluted by distortion. It like pouring motor oil over a gourmet dinner. It may go down more smoothly, but is it desirable?
My prediction is that music from this period will be known as forgettable and will not last courtesy of overly enthusiatic sound engineers and singers insecurities about their voices.
Autotune is like a toupee — You can always tell…except when you can’t! Sometimes I listen to a vocal track that I’ve done and I’m a little irked because I think the auto-tune is a little too obvious — then it dawns on me that I didn’t use auto-tune on that track! I have to laugh at people who claim that they can “always tell” — No way! For the record, Melodyne is way way better than Antares — Absolutely no comparison!
Ken —
How do you feel about overdubbing — Is that cheating also? There indeed was a time when everything was done in one take — Should we go back to that? When Bob Dylan started using an electric guitar, there was a whole folk community that turned on him because electric guitars weren’t legitmate instruments. How did that turn out? I agree that there is no point in a truly phenominal singer ever needing to use any kind of auto-tune software but I would suggest that less than one percent of all pop singers fall into this category. Is pitch correcting really all that different from doing mulitple takes and comping the best parts? (which EVERYONE as in EVERYONE does) It’s just plain silly to NOT take full advantage of technology to make a recording (and a perfomance) sound as good as possible. It goes without saying that the gimicky tasteless stuff is just a waste of everyone’s time but any and all technology can be used poorly or it can be used with skill. The bottom line for me is always, “Does it sound good?”.
More Comments: ‹ Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · … · 10 · Next ›