Pitch correction software has applications from restoration and mix-rescue to outright distortion of a voice or instrument. I’ll discuss some of the more tasteful uses of these auto-tune tools (whether the original from Antares, or a variant like the free GSnap) below. But first I thought I’d highlight their misuse to illustrate the effects we usually try to avoid.
So, listen here to 10 of pop music’s most blatant auto-tune abuses:
If you’re unfamiliar with Auto-tune, and especially if you listen to much pop and rock, you might not hear it initially. When overdone, the effect yields an unnatural yodel or warble in a singer’s voice. But the sound is so commonplace in modern mainstream music that your ears may have tuned out the auto-tune!
The songs in this clip, in order, and the phrases most affected by auto-tuning to help you spot them:
Dixie Chicks – The Long Way Around – Noticeable on “parents” and “but I.”
T-Pain – I’m Sprung – Especially obvious on “homies” and “lady.”
Avril Lavigne – Complicated – Listen to “way,” “when,” “driving,” “you’re.”
Uncle Kracker – Follow Me
The whole vocal sounds strained, but especially the word “goodbye.”
Maroon 5 – She Will Be Loved – Listen for “rain” and “smile.”
Natasha Bedingfield – Love Like This – “Apart” and “life.”
Sean Kingston – Beautiful girls – “OoooOver” doesn’t sound human.
JoJo – Too Little Too Late – Appropriately, “problem” stands out.
Rascal Flatts – Life is a Highway
Every vocal, foreground and background, is treated, but “drive” in particular.
New Found Glory – Hit or Miss – “Thriller”, and every time Jordan sings “I.”
The Cher Effect
When used noticeably, an auto-tuner produces what most call “The Cher Effect“, named for her trademark sound in the song Believe*. (In essence, we named the effect like scientists naming a new disease after its first victim.) Treated this heavily, a vocal track sounds synthetic, and obviously processed.
But not all auto-tuning is so blatant. In the sample above, it’s harder to hear the pitch correction on Uncle Kracker and Avril than on T-Pain and Bedingfield.
Tasteful Uses
As with any tool, a little care can yield great results. Some simple things to keep in mind about pitch correction tools:
- Performance: Most importantly, an auto-tuner isn’t a shortcut to a perfect performance. If you can’t sing the song properly, no amount of post-processing will make it sound like you did. So when your pitch matters, and you don’t want to correct it with an effect, you’ll need to work on your performance until it’s right.
- Less is more: The fewer notes you correct, the less obvious your use of an auto tuner will be. Consider automating the plugin so it acts only when most needed.
- Graphical mode: If your pitch correction software offers a graphical mode (like Antares Auto-Tune and Melodyne,) learn how to work with it. The default “auto” modes are OK for basic corrections, but often produce noticeable yodeling.
- Backing vocals: In general, you can get away with more pitch correction on backing vocals than lead vocals.
- Outdated: Obvious vocoder-style autotuning is dated, and borders on kitschy. The synthetic warbling vocal sound marks songs as having come from a specific era, the same way gated-reverb on drums instantly places a song in the 1980’s. Remember: If you make the auto tuner obvious, people will say your song uses “the Cher effect.” Let this be a guideline.
Be sure it’s needed
Two songs have auto tuners on my mind today: Snoop’s Sensual Seduction (because of Anil Dash’s ruminations on the death of the analog vocoder,) and Natasha Bedingfield’s Love Like This, which I heard on the radio. In the former, the auto tuner is clearly a gimmick. But every time I hear Bedingfield’s song, I’m struck by the same question: Why do that to her voice?
She’s a fantastic singer, and once you’ve heard the song without the cheesy auto tuner effect, it’s hard to take the radio single seriously.
And there’s a lesson in that for home recordists, (even those of us who don’t write pop music,) which echoes the rule of mixing: If an effect significantly changes the sound of a track, especially one so important as the lead vocal, be sure that change improves the song before committing it to the mix.
See Also: The Rule of Mixing
For more home recording tips,
Subscribe to the Hometracked feed, or receive email updates.
Tags: freeplugins, mixing
238 comments
Trackback URI Comments feed for this article
Jenn-
I like Rascal Flatts – have all of their releases and have seen them live several times — and I hate to break you bubble but the reason you think it sounds so good live is that they are being as heavily processed live (with pitch correctors and vocal harmonizers, too) as they are in the studio. What makes you think the technology doesn’t follow them to the stage?
I’ve heard them in informal, live situations three times — once with their band and twice with just the three of them and a couple of guitars — every time, the harmonies were off and Gary went flat all over the place. The first time I heard it I said, “OK, maybe Gary has a cold” (blocked ears and sinuses can affect your ability to stay on pitch), but it was all three times — and it was painful to listen to.
Here’s one that has been bothering me.
Deftones – Hole In The Earth, second verse on the words “Explain” and “Able.”
http://www.audiogeekzine.com/holeintheearth.mp3
I will say this…I have recorded some bands and have thought “that kid’s voice sounds like it has bad auto-tune on it”. haha. but in reality, it was just his voice. I do think that a couple of the examples above could be that…but overall, yeah, its overused. I’m only for using it if it means barely pitch correcting an otherwise brilliant performance. sometimes you an ice a drummer or a singer if you make them play/sing something over and over and over. sometimes the emotion behind the pitch makes the record. But, still. I am NOT for using this to make people that CAN’T sing, sing well. it pisses me off.
[@Jon] > Deftones – Hole In The Earth, second verse on the words “Explain” and “Able.”
Ya, “Able” is particularly obvious. It’s odd there, ‘cuz it wouldn’t even matter to the song if he sang a bit out of pitch.
[@Blake] > I’m only for using it if it means barely pitch correcting an otherwise brilliant performance.
Agreed. If you can hear the autotuner working at all, then it’s probably not a brilliant performance!
American Idol uses it too; I was watching an episode yesterday (I don’t know how far behind I am here in India), and they had blatantly auto-tuned a contestant’s performance.
I’m not sure if it’s my broadcasting network that did it, or the producers themselves.
I’ve also seen it used on Ugly Betty’s nephew’s voice (when he sings in a broadway musical and his dad dies.. *sniff*). This was only on the promo, though, so it wasn’t done by the producers. I swear, I only watched the episode to check if he was being auto-tuned.
> I’m not sure if it’s my broadcasting network that did it, or the producers themselves.
I hear the same thing all the time here in Canada, so I assume it’s the producers, rather than the broadcaster.
I am always seeing people get the 3 different sounds mixed up…. Roger troutman and peter frampton did NOT use a Vocoder or Autotune….. They Used the TALKBOX, which is completely different and to say otherwise an insult to talkboxers… Cher, Snoop, and Tpain used Autotune, not a talkbox or vocoder….
the difference between the 3 are easily put
Talkbox: An electric instrument is played with the audio running to the talkbox, the audio is then forced through a tube that is placed in the mouth… the user mouths words and lets the instrument do the talking. There is NO VOCAL USE IN A TALKBOX
Vocoder: A voice is blended/layered with an instrument to give it a vocoded effect. Usually a software effect, there is no tube placed in the mouth, it is just a blend of instruments and vocals creating the electronic sound….
Autotune: Is STRICTLY VOICE…. when someone sings out of pitch, the autotune kicks in and corrects it. The cher effect as people call it is when the autotune Immediately corrects an out of pitch tone…. You are able to make it less subtle to where it takes a little longer to correct the pitch, but to achieve that cher effect, the correction takes place immediately….. There Is NO INSTRUMENT INVOLVED, IT IS JUST VOICE PITCH CORRECTION
BNKRECORDS: Not sure who you’re getting frustrated with here…
Anyway, in your description of vocoder, you said “blended/layered”, which kind of doesn’t quite explain it… one way to think of it is that a sound (typically a synthesizer) is passing through a complex filter, which is being shaped by another sound (typically a voice). So the synthesizer sound takes on the “shape” of your voice, even though you don’t actually hear the voice itself.
keithhandy
Thank you for correcting that, It was like 3 in the mornin when i posted that so i was a little tired, but you are correct…. As far as who I was getting frustrated with, I wasnt talking about anyone in here, I made a tpain cant sing video on youtube and alot of people were saying things like “tpain is nothing new, Roger Troutman and Peter frampton have been using that effect for years”…. i was only refering to those kind of comments……
Melodyne requires caring about the song you’re working on. Avoid getting the full version so you don’t have a one-button-tunes-and-quantizes-all option. Antares makes that button much more readily available.
Well I had to comment because on American Idol they debuted the Paula Abdull song on Randy’s new disc. It was apparent that there was a pitch correcting device in action. I had to cringe at the hypocrisy of it all as they sit there and judge the contestants and then point out the slightest off pitch note. But at the same time it seems that the sound of pitch correcting devices is now status quo and if you don’t use it then you’re like out of it dude.
Well if you want to see the most well known tune abuse visit:
http://www.whatmp3.net/50cents.html
He basically killed pop music with his rap…
http://lyrics.whatmp3.net/lyrics/killed.html
Natasha Bedingfield – Love Like This – “Apart” and “life.”
Very good example I like it!!
As a recording artist (lead vocals/guitar) I prefer cheating in a far more honest fashion. I sing the song three or four times, record all four takes and then listen to the first recording and replace problematic sections with relevant portions of the other 3 recordings. Its cheating because I didn’t sing the song perfectly straight through, but honest because I did sing every note myself.
If you’re too lazy to do that than by all means use autotune, but my way works way better if you’re at all consistent in your performance.
The T-Pain and Natasha Bedingfield examples are CLEARLY intentional to get the Zapp/Roger Troutman sound. They aren’t intended to sound natural.
More Comments: ‹ Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · … · 10 · Next ›