Linkin Park’s singles often inspire the question “haven’t they already written this song?” An mp3 that does the rounds from time to time mixes Numb (on the left) and Pushing Me Away (on the right) to illustrate this with almost comical effect: All Linken Park Songs Sound Exactly The Same.
As shown below, and forgive the hyperbole, much more than they sound the same all Linkin Park songs look the same. And while it’s easy to criticize the band for their overuse of a formula that’s by now cliche, the similarity between their tracks at least holds a lesson on the importance of song arrangement in pop music production.
The Linkin Park Formula
The standard Linkin Park structure looks like this:
- Quiet intro: Each song has a relatively quiet two-measure intro.
- The instrumental kicker: The full band come in together on the down-beat, and play two or four high energy measures, usually instrumental.
- Quiet verse: The song eases off for a verse or two, heightening the dynamic contrast between the song’s sections.
- Heavy chorus: Usually the same chords established in the kicker, with Chester screaming over top for added emotion.
Here’s how it “looks” in practice. Each image below shows the audio level in (roughly) the first 90 seconds of a Linkin Park song. Note that I adjusted the tempo of a few tracks for better visual alignment:
If the pattern isn’t clear to you, mouse-over each image to highlight the 4 sections: Intro, kicker, verse, chorus. And click the title to hear the song on Youtube.
There’s nothing particularly surprising or innovative about the structure. But its repeated use by Linkin Park is clearly successful: They’re one of a few acts still selling lots of CDs.
Why It Works
There are several reasons why this song formula works, and whether or not you record pop music, understanding the reasons will make you a better producer:
Dynamic contrast: Our senses are drawn to change (remember why we listen to reference tracks while mixing?) so we find dynamic, evolving sounds more interesting. The up-and-down of a typical Linkin Park song grabs listeners’ attention on an instinctive level.
Memorable hooks: Because it’s often jarring, the kicker at the start of Linkin Park’s songs is memorable, and makes for a great hook. Pop songs hit or miss mainly on the effectiveness of their hooks.
Familiarity: For lovers, it breeds contempt. For pop music artists, familiarity breeds fans. It’s a truism in the traditional music industry that to succeed, a band needs a “sound.” Linkin Park’s re-use of the same basic song structure makes their music instantly recognizable, and lets their listeners feel immediately comfortable with new material.
Again, you may not write or record pop music. You may even despise the stuff. But knowing why a band would choose to re-use a formula like this will help you make better decisions about your own song arrangements (even if only to avoid having your music compared to Linkin Park.)
Cheap Gimmick?
What does this say about Linkin Park’s music?
On one hand, the band and their producers deserve kudos for finding and exploiting a successful formula. They’re in the entertainment business, after all, and appealing to fans is any entertainer’s number one job.
On the other hand, it’s hard not to view the six images above as a statement on the music industry. The major labels decry the actions of listeners who download music from free sources. But this is the alternative they offer: The same song, repackaged six different ways. The vast majority of music listeners who aren’t Linkin Park fans ask the same question I did in the first sentence, “Haven’t they already written this song?” And the obvious follow-up question, “Why would I pay for it more than once?”
For more indie artist and home recording tips,
Subscribe to the Hometracked feed, or receive email updates.
271 comments
Trackback URI Comments feed for this article
im not linkin park fan but whats wrong with having consistency??? everyones acting like its a conspiracy lol. If i had a band i would want to have some distinctive aspect that defines my band. If it was a copy of other bands that would be different. If every song sounded completely different who the hell would want to go buy an entire album for one or two songs that appeal to them?
you could do this to Beethoven and Tchaikovsky… quiet intro, heavy, quiet, build up, chorus, shake, tuck, and zip… quit being a hater. its the formula of a SONG. this complaint is like saying, ‘why do we have to introduce ourselves upon meeting someone EVERYTIME???’ its just what makes sense, so dont write yourself off to having conversations with new people because you note a suspicious thread of repetition.
here’s a suggestion: vary the artists you listen to. tard. DAMMIT… you made me a hater!
Not only do they sound and look the same, but Jesus look at the clipping. Disgraceful sound engineering, which sadly is far too common with commercial albums these days.
There isn’t actually any clipping. Just checked it by opening the song into Cubase. The author either changed it himself or got those pictures fro someone who changed it. Nice try though.
Don’t all songs have that structure? A commercial success doesn’t mean they somehow cheated you…and you suck
> Don’t all songs have that structure?
Really, no, they don’t.
Do you guys know what the difference between Nirvana and Linkin Park regarding this patten phenomena? Nirvana were basically the pioneers, while Linkin Park do recycle the patten for commercial use. I did once a work about “Smells Like Teen Spirit”, which does has that patten as mentioned above, and researched the reasons why it was successful. Well, some people even claim that Nirvana invented the quite verse/loud chorus thing, as like it nobody ever did it before in music! Maybe it’s an exaggeration, but one thing for sure, not all of Nirvana’s songs are like that.
takes me one step closer to the edge coz i’m about to break
shut up when i’m talking to you…………………………………shut up
shut up
shut up
shut up
………shut up! coz i’m about to break
Nirvana were the first to do this commercially, but they did it with more variation and better writing. But they said they ripped it off from The Pixies.
You know what, I have been a fan of Linkin Park for so long and really I am getting sick of people goin on about how crap Linkin Park is there is even a game of how to kill fucking Linkin Park. Man! people have no lives if all they do almost every fucking day is complain on how Linkin park are.
Its simple! if you dont like them or something on the lines of that than dont listen to them or even bother thinking about them. Only reason why people do this is because they have nothing better to do and all they do is whine about how bad Linkin Park are. If they’re not you’re taste in music fucking get over it. Linkin Park’s song are not overplayed at all, alot of songs do that I dont understand WHY people instantly go oh yeaaah Linkin Park is so overrated for being played to much. Eh whatever… There are many bands and Singers are overrated as well.
So if you dont like their music or them listen to other music, I’m sure Linkin Park and other fans and genral people don’t give a fuck about this.
I love Linkin Park and i admit they have songs alike…but what’s the point?? what really matters is that their songs are very good!!
And the last album by them shows that their songs can sound VERY different of each other…GO LP!!!!!!!!!!! LINKIN PARK 4EVER….
p.s. LP haters: Go away!!!:x
Some people love LP, some people don’t. It’s not for everyone as everyone has different taste so where do you get off (you asshole up there) insulting people who like/love LP.
Liking a certain band has nothing to do with someone’s intelligence or taste in music overall. It’s just preference. Just like the fact that I love and appreciate LP as much as I do with Radiohead.
And why would you (the other idiot on here – Anyonewithhalfabrain) say anyone with half a brain wouldn’t like LP or realise that they’re music isn’t good? You saying only mentally retarded people enjoy LP’s music?
I don’t prefer Nickleback but I don’t go around saying people who do have hollow skulls. I just don’t listen to it.
Stop being such a hater. You’re a total loser for bagging other people out who don’t share the same things as you. You are far from being better than LP fans.
I don’t care that you hate LP, it’s just when you attacked us fans for liking them. That’s personal.
I hope LP stays around forever.
More Comments: ‹ Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · … · 11 · Next ›