We’ve all experienced it: 3 seconds into a track you’ve never heard, you know instinctively that it was recorded and mixed in someone’s bedroom.
Amateur recordings often sound “amateur.” But what differentiates these hometracked opuses from professional recordings? It’s not just fidelity or sonic quality: Many competent engineers produce lo-fi or distorted mixes on purpose, when it suits the song. Rather, amateur recordings tend to share some key traits, telltale signs that the mixing and recording are the work of a novice.
You can learn to recognize and address these traits in your own recordings, and produce more polished, professional mixes:
- Too much bass: Nothing says amateur mix like a boomy, overpowering bottom-end. Novice engineers often monitor and mix through headphones or small speakers which under-represent low frequencies. It’s natural to compensate by boosting the bass instruments, but this in turn yields muddy, indistinct mixes. If you find your mixes sound boomy on other systems, try checking everything you do against a commercial reference CD to better gauge the appropriate bass levels.
- Poor drum levels: For great drum tracks, everything in the recording chain matters: The room, the drums, the microphones (and of course the drummer.) So before recording a band, professional engineers spend days or weeks tweaking each element in the chain for the best drum sound, and to ensure that no single drum overpowers or vanishes in the mix. In fact, drums are arguably the hardest instrument to record. A large kit can require 10 or more microphones, so it’s little wonder the drums in amateur recordings often come up short.
But even if we don’t have a $50,000 mic collection to capture big studio sound, we amateurs can still at least get good levels. If you have difficulty getting your drums mixed right, try this: Listen to a modern recording that’s sonically similar to the track you’re mixing, and slowly lower the volume. Notice, as the level approaches 0, which elements of the mix are the last to disappear. In contemporary music, it’s usually the kick drum, snare drum, and lead vocal. Now, try to replicate this in your own mixes. - Clashing instruments: This is an issue with arrangement as much as production. A song’s parts can lack distinction because the individual instruments don’t have their own space within the song’s arrangement. It’s a tell-tale sign of an amateur mix because many of us write as we record, progressively adding new layers to a song, rather than arranging ahead of time and recording only what’s needed. There’s nothing wrong with this approach, per se, but it clearly separates the amateurs from the pros: A professional producer refines the arrangement before setting foot in the studio.
If you find your instrumentation lacks distinction, consider revising the arrangement to add some space. Let your tracks breathe. - Uneven vocals: The biggest difference between superstar singers and us wannabes isn’t pitch or tone or vibrato. (Let’s face it: Some of the best selling artists are terrible singers, at least in the classical sense.) Rather, what separates good from great, most often, is dynamics. A great singer knows how to control the volume of her voice, and more importantly, when to change her volume. And this has as much to do with the singer’s skill in front of a microphone as it does with her voice. When we hear uneven vocals, we hear a bad bar band with the singer mumbling 2 feet back from the microphone, or half-swallowing the mic and screaming. In other words, an amateur.
Recording vocals more evenly isn’t hard. First and foremost, the singer must practice! Before you hit record, ensure the singer knows every change in the song, and even when it’s best to inhale throughout the song for optimum breath control.
And take note of this simple reminder: near … far … near … far - Overused reverb: When used to add ambience or depth, reverb is best applied sparingly. Beginners often miss this, opting for the “some is good, more is better” approach (which is understandable: Remember how lush and important your voice sounded the first time you heard it through a “Carnegie Hall” reverb preset?) But in modern commercial recordings, reverb, unless it’s used as an obvious effect, is usually inaudible, adding texture to the sound without actually being perceptible. Best advice: Raise the reverb level until it’s just present, then back off a notch. And resist the urge to soak your vocals in deep chamber and hall reverb effects.
- Cheap reverb: Even an untrained ear can hear the difference between a $3000 Lexicon unit and the free reverb built into your multitrack recorder. Cheap reverbs sound, basically, cheap. Especially on lead vocals. If you don’t have access to a decent plugin (though SIR, considered one of the best, is free,) consider avoiding reverb altogether. Or at least, per the point above, avoid obvious reverb.
- “Fake” drums: More specifically, obviously programmed drums attempting to pass as live drums. This isn’t an issue in electronic and dance music, where listeners expect to hear steady quantized beats from drum machines. But pop and rock music have dynamic rhythm requirements, and listeners are conditioned to expect a more natural, nuanced sound from the drum track.
The ride cymbal and snare drum are the most obvious amateur giveaways. A snare drum’s tone depends on where, and how hard, the stick hits the head, and this goes double for the ride cymbal, especially near the bell. So when a drum track features 32 bars of 8th notes using the same ride cymbal sample at the same volume, listeners always sense something’s not right.
If you don’t have access to a drummer and drum kit, you can still create believable programmed drum tracks with a little effort. This article from Sound On Sound has some great tips on humanizing for more realistic drum beats. - Muddy, indistinct vocals: If a song has lyrics, listeners should be able to hear those lyrics. That might sound obvious, but it’s an important point lost on many novice recordists. Several things contribute to indistinct vocals:
The proximity effect on a directional microphone. Most vocal mics boost the low frequencies of close-miked sound sources, so back off the mic a few inches for a clearer sound.
Singing without a pop filter. Plosives produce a blast of air that sounds careless and lazy. If you don’t have a pop screen, you can easily make your own.
Poor or inappropriate EQ. Novices often attempt to clean up a vocal track by boosting high frequencies, hoping to add definition. However, this usually has the opposite effect, increasing sibilance and giving the vocal a sharp, edgy sound without improving the clarity. It’s far more effective to clean a track with a low-frequency cut, and you can safely remove everything below 100Hz from vocals. In fact, your microphone might even feature a low-frequency roll off switch for this purpose.
Your mix sells the vocal performance. So make sure the lyrics can be heard. - Too much bad room sound: Unless you have a well-treated space, or record in a very large room, your room probably doesn’t flatter your recordings. (See The Portable Vocal Booth for details.) However, a bad room doesn’t automatically equal bad recordings. Many classic albums were recorded in less-than-perfect environments by engineers wise enough to limit the room’s presence on the recording.
Strive to minimize the room sound in your recordings by close-miking whenever possible, and choosing microphones with polar patterns that reduce the capture of extra room noise. - Timing problems: Professional musicians practice a song for weeks or months before recording it. But as noted above, many amateurs write while they record, essentially eliminating practice from the process. Additionally, whether through impatience or inexperience, beginners tend to approach recording with a “fix it in the mix” mentality, which naturally leads to sloppy takes. You don’t need to aim for perfection to sound like a pro. But you do need your “keeper” takes to be free of obvious timing errors. A single snare drum hit lagging by a 16th of a beat is enough to make your whole track sound amateur.
Worded another way: Good bands are tight, so when you don’t sound tight people assume you’re not good. Spend some more time practicing your new song before hitting record, and you’ll capture better performances. And sound more professional as a result.
See Also: 5 Ways To Improve Your Recordings Today, Record Better Vocals
For more home recording tips,
Subscribe to the Hometracked feed, or receive email updates.
Tags: EQ, mixing, performance, production, snare-drum, vocals
38 comments
Trackback URI Comments feed for this article
this is stupid. if you have talent you dont need to know these things cause they are inherent or invalid. so basically this is an article for people who dont have any recording or arranging talent but WANT to sound like they do. this is exactly what is wrong with the world of amateur recording. i dont want to hear your shitty demo tape
Good article. I’d add that a great home studio upgrade that even opens your mind creatively, as a self-producer, is adding an half-track tape machine in the process (they are cheap on ebay and, in some way, are even an investment that lasts forever).
With any half-decent soundcard (4ins 4outs) you have plenty of options: sending tracks to tape on and back to the DAW in realtime, on their own dedicated bus, mixing down to tape, or even use the deck as a wondeful tape delay.
I myself use one and find it offers a wide palette of sonic variations.
All the best.
hdlss: and I don’t want to hear your shitty whining. Tip: people aren’t necessarily born with a good grasp of bass EQ.
Very good information. Dont forget to get rid of any unwanted information in your track. Like empty space between sections, clicks, pops, buzzing, and mic stand bumps. Also learn how to use a hi pass filter to get rid of the unnecessary low end in vocal, guitar and drum tracks. You can even clean up and make a bass track sound less muddy by cutting some of the ultra low frequencies. Anyhow good post. Cheers!
Sean
theglobalguitarist.com
I’ve always followed these principles in music production , but still amazed how many even professional engineers create boomy, sizzling high-end and reverb drown mixes. It’s almost like a certain kind of aesthetics. Or maybe it’s just drugs ??
good info but… well, whatever if it feels good it is good listen to your mix on a variety of systems & if you dig it then dig it BUT if it doesn’t then simply pay attention keep experimenting and figure what it is thats bothering YOU about it the sound
i make/record music to please myself not to be judged by anyone elses “normal” or standard or to fit in with whats already been done.
But if thats your context then yeah this article has some good basic checkpoints
Well, I’m very sorry for trying to learn. I’ll go and have myself killed now.
quote]
kk says:
December 24, 2012 at 10:47 pm
good info but… well, whatever if it feels good it is good listen to your mix on a variety of systems & if you dig it then dig it
i make/record music to please myself not to be judged by anyone elses “normal†or standard or to fit in with whats already been done. checkpoints [/quote]
Bob says:
Huh??? I think you’ve been digging too long and your self absorption level is off the charts. Why even post on a wonderful sharing site like hometracked.com if you only record music to please yourself and don’t value anyone elses opinion or experience? You are doing yourself a disservice and going against the KK holy grail of “music to please myself and not to be judged by anyone elses “normal or standard or to fit in with what’s already been done”.
Me thinks that you,
For way too long,
Have been sucking in,
That smoke filled bong.
LOL…Andy your reply to kk was hilarious…cracked me up!!!
Andy says:
July 17, 2013 at 4:22 pm
Well, I’m very sorry for trying to learn. I’ll go and have myself killed now.
I’ve heard professional recordings that suffer from many of these amateurish issues.
Remember fucking art dudes…? If you can smash 2 rusty spoons together and record it with a razor edge flip phone from 2005..and you feel something “real” from it. .then Jesus Christ! You’re an artist! ..plug in. .plug in. .blah blah ..this is what we have lost. ..man I just noticed this was from 2015
fantastic issues altogether, you simply gained a nnew reader.
What might you recommend iin regards to your put up that you juhst made
a few day in the past? Any positive?
More Comments: ‹ Previous · 1 · 2